More From Eric Dixon at

Twitter Rank #35 For Startup Advice May 2014 (#44 June 2014, #50 July 2014 -- now TRENDING UP at #41 for August 2014). Go to my professional site for solutions to your legal, business and strategic problems. Bitcoin Protocol Development -- Among the World's Legal Leaders in New Bitcoin Technology -- Top Strategic Judgment -- When You Need A Fixer -- Explore Information Protection and Cryptographic Security -- MUST-WIN: JUST DON'T LOSE -- SURVIVE!: Under Investigation? Being Sued? Handling Extreme Stress -- Corporate Issues -- Startup Issues -- Investor Issues -- Contracts To Meet Your Needs -- Opposition Research -- Intellectual Property, Media and Reputation Issues -- Independent, top-notch legal, strategic and personal advice -- Extensive ghostwriting, speechwriting, book writing, issue research, press and crisis management services. Listed among the American Bar Association's Law Bloggers (Blawgers). Contact 917-696-2442.

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Pension Funds And Controversial Investments

From time to time, political observers wonder with shock and awe how public employee pension funds stay invested in the stock of companies which sell tobacco, produce toxic chemicals or manufacture guns.

It's actually very simple.  The pension funds are doing their job.

This takes some explanation. It's very simple.  The job of the pension fund manager is to make money.  That is, to protect and grow the investment of the public employees whose defined contributions -- or contributions from another source, in defined benefit plans -- have gone into the fund.  If a pension fund keeps an investment in a tobacco or weapons manufacturer, the fund is doing its one and only job on behalf of its beneficiaries, who are the only people to whom the fund owes any fiduciary or legal duty.

The tricky part is that the funds often project a certain investment rate of return in order to meet outflows to pension fund beneficiaries (retired workers).  This is no easy job, and it's easy to miss your targets and have a fund deficit (that is, outflows or projected future liabilities are outpacing the actual investment returns of the fund).

But the main point here is that the pension fund exists to provide for the retirement of its beneficiaries, the public workers.  It's all about protecting and advancing their financial interest.  

It is most certainly not about making political statements by divesting or selling the stock of companies which might be considered politically incorrect (like tobacco companies).  Although they are public sector workers, fund beneficiaries are not obligated to take political positions in accordance with any elected official.  Especially when those statements would be made and paid for with the money of the public workers.

1 comment:

  1. Authorities should devise a clear framework to safeguard potential investors from these controversial investments.