More From Eric Dixon at

Support Independent Investigations With Bitcoin:
Send Bitcoin Here: 171GMeYRD7CaY6tkXs8dSTjLbAtFazxhVL

Top 50 Twitter Rank of Worldwide Startup Advisors For Much of 2014
. Go to my professional site for solutions to your legal, business and strategic problems. The only lawyer who is a co-inventor of multiple, allowed-for-grant patents on blockchain technology!!! Blockchain and Digital Currency Protocol Development --
Top Strategic Judgment -- When You Need A Fixer -- Explore Information Protection and Cryptographic Security -- MUST-WIN: JUST DON'T LOSE -- SURVIVE!: Under Investigation? Being Sued? Handling Extreme Stress -- Corporate Issues -- Startup Issues -- Investor Issues -- Contracts To Meet Your Needs -- Opposition Research -- Intellectual Property, Media and Reputation Issues -- Independent, top-notch legal, strategic and personal advice -- Extensive ghostwriting, speechwriting, book writing, issue research, press and crisis management services. Listed by American Bar Association's Law Bloggers (Blawgers). Contact European Union audiences: This site uses a third party site administrator which may use cookies but this site is intended for AMERICAN clients and prospective clients only!

Friday, February 5, 2010

Jersey Corruption Trials: Political Crime

A few comments regarding the federal criminal trial of Leona Beldini, Jersey City Deputy Mayor and one-time burlesque dancer.
This trial is about bribery, and it is about Beldini's allegedly criminal conduct.   It is, however, also about the government's principal witness -- who today has the legal name of Solomon Dwek.  

If (1) Dwek's storytelling is the main supporting evidence in the remainder of some several dozen cases to a bunch of videotapes suggesting -- but by no means clearly demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt -- less than wholesome conduct, (2) the bribes never went to defendant Beldini but instead went to another defendant named Ed Cheatam (as captured on videotape, and who pleaded guilty), and (3) Cheatam was not called as a witness by the prosecution, it suggests that the evidence against Beldini merely suggests she was in bad company, may have been imprudent, foolish or flat out stupid.   But it just does not seem to be anywhere near the conclusive evidence of criminal wrongdoing.   Remember, when the case is about sending someone to jail, the sketchy concept of "probably" does not satisfy the requisite "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of proof.   Each of the three enumerated items above provide, or at least suggest, the presence of reasonable doubt.

When do we start wondering whether any of the other cases going to trial will be dropped?  

If the evidence, seeming weak in light of the high standard of proof in a criminal trial, is of this caliber, what does this say about all the prosecutioin bluster this past summer?  

Does law enforcement lose some of its hard-fought credibility?  

Did someone just try too hard to make some cases because political corruption cases had sex appeal, both in a political context and career advancement angle?

Were people like Beldini prosecuted, not for actual, provable crimes, but because they were public officials and/or involved in politics?  Did the real crime become engaging in politics?  In other words, were they prosecuted, not for what they did, but for who they were?

Eric Dixon is a New York lawyer and strategic consultant for businesses, political campaigns and individuals. Mr. Dixon is available for comment or consultation at and 917-696-2442. 

No comments:

Post a Comment